2017年6月19日 · The repz prefix (alternately spelled repe) means to increment rsi and rdi then repeat cmps as long as [rsi] and [rdi] compare equal. The rflags register will be set on each iteration; the final iteration where [rsi] ≠ [rdi] is what will …

2016年10月5日 · The issue of the repz ret has been covered here as well as in other sources [2, 3] quite satisfactorily. However, reading neither of these sources, I found answers to the following: What is the actual penalty in a quantitative comparison with ret or nop; ret? Especially in the latter case – is decoding one extra instruction (and an empty one ...

2017年9月29日 · 2) repeat and decrease ecx until ecx equal to 0 or ZF set in the CMPS,SCAS instructions and called repz or repe. The 0xF3 binary prefix is used as: 1) repeat and decrease ecx until ecx equal to 0 or ZF NOT set in the CMPS,SCAS instructions and called repnz or repne. Recently noticed that XACQUIRE/XRELEASE prefixes also have the same binary ...

repz ret: why all the hassle? has some extra details about the specific micro-architectural reasons why that gives K8 and Barcelona a hard time. Avoiding 1-byte ret as a possible branch target: AMD's optimization guide for K10 (Barcelona) recommends 3-byte ret 0 in those cases, which pops zero bytes from the stack as well as returning.

2010年1月19日 · The REPZ and REPNZ prefixes are synonymous forms of the REPE and REPNE prefixes, respectively.) Share.

2016年2月24日 · Let's talk about the prefix REPZ now. From vol. 1, §7.3.9.2: The following repeat prefixes can be used in conjunction with a count in the ECX register to cause a string instruction [hyphen removed] to repeat: REP — Repeat while the ECX register not zero. REPE/REPZ — Repeat while the ECX register not zero and the ZF flag is set.

Prefixes (other than lock) that don't apply to an instruction are ignored in practice by existing CPUs.. The documentation says using rep with instructions it doesn't apply to is "reserved and can cause unpredictable behaviour" because future CPUs might recognize it as part of …

Looking at the following assembly code: MOV ESI, DWORD PTR [EBP + C] MOV ECX, EDI MOV EAX, EAX SHR ECX, 2 LEA EDI, DWORD PTR[EBX + 18] REP MOVS DWORD PTR ES:[EDI], DWORD PTR [ESI] MOV ECX, EAX A...

2014年11月6日 · I am trying to reverse engineer a binary and the following instruction is confusing me, can anyone clarify what exactly this does? =>0x804854e: repnz scas al,BYTE PTR es:[edi] 0x8048550: ...

2014年5月12日 · The solution is simple, you just need to put the repz and the ret on two consecutive lines. Also note that this optimization is obsolete, AMD now recommends to use ret 0 if your ret is a branch target (even for fall-through). In fact for even more recent AMD chips this whole optimization is not needed because the branch predictor works differently.