
1984 P Washington Quarter Photos, Mintage, Specifications, Errors ...
1984 P Washington Quarter Specifications: Circulation Strikes: 676,545,000 Proof Strikes: 0 Content: Cladding 75% Copper 25% Nickel, core 100% Copper
1984 P Washington Quarter Mint Error - Mis-Aligned Obverse Die
2023年12月26日 · The 1984-P quarter is an example of a stable misalignment. Many other quarters were struck by this same die pair, with each misalignment sharing the same direction …
1984 P Quarter without Mintmark! - Coin Talk
2017年12月29日 · There was a 1989 P Washington (with no mint mark/or worn away/ or error???) in similar condition that sold on ebay for 2.99 this month..... jake1932 , Dec 29, 2017 #5 + …
1984P QUARTER ERROR? - Coin Talk
2013年10月10日 · I have 1984 quarter copper, what is the value? sophiaslion, Jun 28, 2016 #7 + Quote Reply.
1984 P Error Quarter? - Coin Community Forum
2013年5月28日 · 2023 P Washington Quarter Eleanor Roosevelt; 2022 P Washington Quarter Dr Sally Ride; 2018 Block Island Quarter: WDDO-009; 1964 Lincoln DDO-022 Unc Confirmation …
1984-P Washington Quarter Struck Off Center - Coin Community …
2025年1月21日 · 1999 Georgia State Quarter Missing Nickel Clad; Guess The Price - Season 90 - Round 6; Post Your Coins/Medals/Tokens That Are Intentionally Dual-Dated; Post Your Coins, …
1984P Washington Quarter dark brown - Coin Talk
2020年5月21日 · I received this 1984P quarter in change. It is all brown and has a small notch or dent on the side of the coin. When I first held it, I noticed it felt lighter than other quarters I had. …
1984 P Washington Quarter In God We Trust Error?
2018年9月30日 · 2024 P Patsy Mink Quarter: Different DDR; 1942 Chrome Nickel 5c! 2023 P Nickel: Another WDDR-083; Heaton/Birmingham Mint Advertising, Specimen And Pattern …
1984 P Quarter Double Die? - Coin Talk
2018年3月12日 · Curious if you guys think this is a double die. I've never seen one before up close so not really sure. I "think" i see the double die on the "United States" and "e pluribus …
1984 p quarter. Mint error - Coin Talk
2019年11月14日 · It's either mechanical doubling, or a contact mark. It is not a RPM (re-punched mintmark) The photo, small area, doesn't lend itself to