2023年7月17日 · The 777-8 with it's new length , is 7m (23ft) longer than the 777-200LR and 3m (10ft) shorter than the 777-300ER, same length as the 777-8F. So basically the 777-8 is closer in capacity to the 77W than the 777-200LR...

2023年8月7日 · If one is an all Boeing fleet though, the 777-8 would be simple to integrate into and would complement the existing fleet. Specifically, the 777-8 would be a good option for airlines wish to replace their existing 777-300ERs on a one-to-one basis rather than up sizing to larger passenger counts of 777-9.

2021年1月9日 · Would a longer 777-8 do better? Say stretch it to around 71m? Sure it would cannibalize a bit more on the 777-9, but if the total of the two models is sufficiently higher to justify keeping two models, that doesn't matter. Most airlines don't requite 8.730Nm brochure range. At 71m it would still be around 8.500Nm. I think most airlines would value the improved CASM …

2022年3月4日 · Anyways, with regards to Ethiopian, this MoU could be pretty significant since it indicates that we might end up seeing 777-8/9s in the fleet in the future. The 787HGW + 777X could make for a pretty killer widebody fleet, and the A350 slots in right in the middle.

2023年8月11日 · If the 777-8 is 20- 30 tons heavier than the A350, then why when you remove the pax and have it as a freighter does it all of a sudden no longer have a weight problem?

2015年1月4日 · However, the 777-8 has greater range and greater payload, appearantly as much as 11 tons of cargo more than the A350-1000, so, in terms of utility and range, the 777-8 is a superior aircraft. I also expect the 777-8 to outsell the 777-200LR, and I think the fact that it's stretched nearly to the length of the 777-300ER helps. Good summary.

2022年7月21日 · The quoted article emphasises the value Cargolux places on 747F capabilities, including nose loading, and their need to keep some frames going longer than they normally would. I expect any 778F order will be accompanied by guarantees from Boeing about future maintenance of some 747Fs.

2017年2月25日 · The 777-8 is also a bit bigger than the 777-200 so it should have a capacity that works well for airlines looking at ultra long haul. The 777-9 could be too much capacity for really long routes. The A359 is a strong competitor for many of the routes that a 777-8 would fly.

2013年12月30日 · Still, gaining 7 inches in cabin width with no change in fuselage diameter seems quite high without some structural changes. On a related point, why doesn't Boeing start building current 777 models with those changes to benefit passenger comfort especially with 10-abreast seating, or do the 777X changes involve some signficant structural differences apart …

2023年7月18日 · The 777-8 keeps the same length but the a350K grows by 3m and OEW from the 350F.. For qantas, going with what was already available in the market made more sense. The 777-8/8F is just a paper plane ATM. Can you post where Boeing claims a …