2016年9月21日 · In the case of 'Es gibt' the meaning is that 'the situation' is giving something. For example 'Es gibt Äpfel im Obstgarten' means that the orchard is providing apples, or as we'd say in English 'there are apples'.

2022年12月1日 · "Es gibt" is purely existential. It's about stating whether something exists or not. "Es sind" could be used kinda the same way, but the exact translation seems to be a little more contextual. It might help if you provided examples of sentences that you found confusing.

2019年7月14日 · “Es gibt” (geben) is more of a “there is” e.g if you want to say “there is a swimming pool next to the school” - “es gibt ein Schwimmbad neben der Schule“

2016年7月18日 · Both would translate to there are. Es gibt is used to say how many things or choices exist in a certain defined space. like: Es gibt 7,4 Milliarden Menschen auf der Welt. Es gibt 4 verschiedene Sorten Eis (in this store). Es sind would be used for things you count in general. Es sind 4 Teller. Es sind 2 Kinder.

2015年8月13日 · I've always known "es gibt" to be equivalent to "there is/are", but I have occasionally seen people use "es sind", and I can't really figure out what the difference is.

2022年4月29日 · Zum Mittagessen gibt es Fisch. The sentence means exactly the same thing. The emphasis though is on a different thing. In the first sentence the emphasis in that there is fish. In the second sentence the emphasis is on fact, that it's lunch. And as the sentence start with something different than "Es gibt" means we have to swap the words around.

In my experience, "es gibt" is the most common way of stating that something exists. But es + sein sometimes seems to be used with this meaning too, for example:

2022年12月8日 · From «Es gibt» never follows a Nominativ since the following part of the phrase can only be an Object which never uses Nominativ. However there is also the Gleichsetzungsnominativ with verbs like sein, scheinen, bleiben, werden.

2023年1月23日 · The object of "es gibt" is accusative. You are right that the accusative form of "der Verkehr" is "den Verkehr." However, when "viel" is not preceded by an article/determiner, it typically takes no endings in the singular (z.B. Es gibt viel Geld). Traffic is uncountable, so it's treated as singular. In the plural, "viel" tends to be declined regardless (z.B. Es gibt viele Kinder).

2016年8月22日 · Es ist schön, dass du diese Frage stellst, denn es gibt mir die Möglichkeit ein Gegenbeispiel zu nennen. ;) Wenn es aber um die Phrase "es gibt" im Sinne von "there is" geht (und nicht wie "it gives"), dann ist es meine ich immer Akkusativ.