Results: The main goals of the new ISUP 2014/WHO 2016 grading system were to establish (I) a more accurate and simplified grade stratification, (II) less overtreatment of indolent prostate cancer as well as (III) an improved patient communication.

The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) has issued guidelines for the grading of prostate cancer based on a consensus conference held in 2014. The recommendations resulting from the 2014 consensus conference were a further …

2019年4月2日 · The main goals of the new ISUP 2014/WHO 2016 grading system were to establish (I) a more accurate and simplified grade stratification, (II) less overtreatment of indolent prostate cancer as well as (III) an improved patient communication.

Five years after the last prostatic carcinoma grading consensus conference of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP), accrual of new data and modification of clinical practice require an update of current pathologic grading guidelines. This manuscript summarizes the proceedings of …

The 2019 ISUP consensus conference on prostatic carcinoma grading acknowledges the important added value of Gleason pattern quantity, minor Gleason patterns, invasive cribriform carcinoma, and IDC, and provides recommendations for their reporting.

The WHO 2022 volume continues to endorse the concept of GGs, also referred to as International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) grades or simply WHO grades, initially proposed at the 2014 ISUP conference and adopted in the fourth edition . In 2019, additional recommendations on grading were independently forwarded by ISUP and the ...

2020年5月3日 · They conclude that the vast majority of studies support an improved prognostic accuracy of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (GG) system over the former Gleason grading and endorse its worldwide application.

To systematically and comprehensively review and summarize the most recent literature assessing the value of the new grading system introduced by the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) in 2014 and accepted by the World Health Organization (WHO) in …

Gleason grading is the best independent predictor for prostate cancer (PCa) progression. Recently, a new PCa grading system has been introduced by the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) and is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO).

En 2005, l’International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) à l’issue d’un meeting de consensus proposait des critères mieux définis afin de mieux caractériser les différents grades de Gleason et en particulier les éléments devant permettre de différencier les aspects cribriformes des GG3 et GG4 [1].