R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 was a 2016 judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom that reversed previous case law on joint enterprise. The Supreme Court delivered its ruling jointly with the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which was considering an appeal from Jamaica, Ruddock v The Queen [2016] UKPC 7.

R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8. This joint case involved two separate appellants who had been convicted for murder on the basis of joint enterprise, after a co-defendant had actually killed the victim. In the case of Jogee, he had been vocally encouraging the principal while he murdered a …

2015年1月13日 · R v Jogee (Appellant) Judgment given. Contents. Case summary; Judgment details; Appeal; Change log; Case summary. Case ID. UKSC/2015/0015. Parties Appellant(s) See judgment. Respondent(s) See judgment. Issue. See judgment. Facts. See judgment. Date of issue. 13 January 2015. Judgment details. Judgment date. 18 February 2016. Neutral citation

2021年5月28日 · Jogee involved joint appeals for murder convictions where victims were killed by the principals’ use of a knife. However, the prosecution procured convictions by arguing that the defendants had engaged in a joint enterprise to commit the act which caused the victim’s death.

2024年7月24日 · The decision in R v Jogee ensures that individuals are not unfairly held responsible for the actions of others unless there is clear evidence of their active involvement and intent to assist or encourage the commission of the offence.

2021年8月19日 · Tom Edwards looks at the impact of the shift from Joint Enterprise to Common Purpose in the five years since Jogee, and considers its impact in both the Crown Court and Court of Appeal.

On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee [2013] EWCA Crim 1433, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen JCPC 2015/0020. The Court, unanimously allowing the appeal, has marked a judicial shift from 32 years of previous law.

2024年1月12日 · R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 was a pivotal case that redefined the legal landscape concerning joint enterprise liability. The decision provided clarity on the principles governing secondary liability in criminal law.

Key point Removed the doctrine of joint enterprise liability from English law: an accessory must have intended to assist in the commission of the principal offence, and not merely have foreseen it Facts The appeal concerned two cases with a similar fact pattern: D was convicted for a murder that was committed by another on the basis that D had foreseen that murder would be …

2016年2月18日 · The judgment of the Supreme Court in R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 is out. The Court held that for a secondary party to be guilty of an offence, he or she must intend to assist or encourage the principal.