2017年8月12日 · Brief of respondent Kaye Melin in opposition filed. Reply of petitioners Ashley Sveen, et al. filed. DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2017. Rescheduled. DISTRIBUTED …

2018年6月11日 · Mark Sveen and respondent Kaye Melin were married in 1997. The next year, Sveen purchased a life insurance policy, naming Melin as the primary beneficiary and …

Holding: The retroactive application of Minnesota’s revocation-on-divorce statute -- which automatically nullifies an ex-spouse’s beneficiary designation on a life-insurance policy or …

2018年6月11日 · After Mark A. Sveen designated his then-wife, Kaye L. Melin, as the primary beneficiary of his life insurance policy, and his children as contingent beneficiaries, Minnesota …

Mark Sveen and respondent Kaye Melin were married in 1997. The next year, Sveen purchased a life insurance policy, naming Melin as the primary beneficiary and designating his two children …

2018年3月19日 · Mark A. Sveen and Kaye L. Melin were married in 1997. Sveen purchased a life insurance policy that year, and the following year he named Melin the primary beneficiary, and …

2018年3月19日 · Kaye Melin (“Melin”) counters that laws regarding divorce implicate the Contracts Clause, and therefore, states do not have the authority to impair such contracts. …

2018年8月15日 · In 1998, Mark A. Sveen designated his then-wife, Kaye L. Melin, as the primary beneficiary of his life insurance policy, and his children as contingent beneficiaries. In 2002, …

Brief of respondent Kaye Melin in opposition filed. Reply of petitioners Ashley Sveen, et al. filed. DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2017. Rescheduled. DISTRIBUTED for Conference of …

Mark Sveen and Kaye Melin (defendant) married in 1997. During the marriage, Sveen purchased a life insurance policy naming Melin as the primary beneficiary and his children from a prior …