1999年9月1日 · In regards to if LDA with GLIDESLOP is a precision APPROACH,IN AIM 5-4-5 ITEM 7 (b)it explains it that an instrument approach based on a navigation system that is not required to meet the precision approach standards of ICAO Annex 10 but provides course and glidepath deviations information.for example Baro-VNAV ,LDA with glide path,LNAV and LPV ...

2021年8月22日 · Flown into MTN before and done this approach. An LDA with glideslope works the same as an ILS, just expect a slightly different orientation / sight picture of the runway when you break out. An LDA is not always offset by an angle, sometimes it’s an LDA and not an ILS because the antenna is next to the runway instead of at the departure end.

2022年7月21日 · LDA approach with the approach course offset by 40 degrees to avoid the P-56, but still has S-19 minimums. The LDA antenna itself is across the river. Reply reply

2015年3月21日 · Found the example you mentioned - the LDA/DME Rwy 22 at KAMA. That one's a little more standard though. The note on the plate says the LDA course is offset by 4.45 degrees from runway heading, and the max offset for an ILS is 3 degrees. That said... kinda sketchy that the approach has you at 5,000' MSL over a prohibited area that tops out at ...

2015年2月5日 · An LDA approach would also qualify. Basically a localizer that doesn't lead into anything. You fly down the localizer until you see the airport and then line up for the runway, or until you hit mins and go missed. edit: Here's the Washington DC Reagan Int'l LDA 19 (pdf warning) approach. It can't be aligned due to the prohibited airspace over ...

2020年7月13日 · Ya this is definitely unusual approach. The profile view is actually pretty innacurate. Following the precision approach S-LDA/GS 25 you'll be at DA at 4.3NM from the airport and have to fly the rest of the way visually ("For LDA/GS fly visual to airport 250 - …

2024年1月28日 · LDA (still hear Martha King saying Localizer Darn Angle Approach) are still around, about 25 of them. ...

2022年6月1日 · Queenstown (NZQN), Tivat (LYTV), 08 at Hilo (PHTO), EKVG also has the tightest RNP approach’s I’ve seen with the U approach for 30, the narrow runway also makes it more difficult. Plenty of RNP approaches with RF legs will have you lined up quite late. There’s heaps in Oceania, such as NZAA, NZWN, NZCH, YBBN, YBCG, YBCS, YBTL, YPAD, YBAS ...

2022年9月21日 · Specifically that an LPV approach didn't meet the strict requirements for a precision approach as defined in ICAO Annex 10, since vertical guidance wasn't coming from a ground-based signal, so they had to call it something else. Though I've also heard that ICAO is changing this with the move to PBN. If/when the FAA will adopt that, who knows.

2023年5月30日 · When the aircraft begins to descend and you're at least 300 ft below the missed approach altitude, set the missed approach altitude in the MCP. The aircraft will not climb back to this altitude, rather it will continue down on VNAV path. (Southwest differs in that they keep it at zero all throughout the approach).