2007年9月17日 · The MP-57 irons are a crowning achievement in the evolution of Mizuno's award winning Grain Flow Forging and Cut Muscle technologies. The Product Development team undertook the task of making the MP-57's the first MP irons with a full cavity, resulting in a significantly larger sweet area than any other iron in the history of the MP line.

2007年9月21日 · The sole designs on these MP-57's are a perfect blend of forgiveness and playability. They beveled the sole and allowed a nice leading edge relief. This combined with an average amount of bounce will satisfy the hardcore blade conversions as well as the golfers looking to take a step up into lower handicap set.

2010年9月9日 · As to your question: the mp 57 was sort of one dimensional in that the cavity is the same size throughout the set while the mp 52 was a blended set with different shapes and sizes of cavities. The long irons have very low centers of gravity and are very forgiving but the short irons have a higher center of gravity and play like blades.

2010年11月23日 · I play all things Mizuno and can clear this up for you. I currently play the 68's and 53's, used to play the 52's, the MX-300's and have played the 57's. The 53's are more forgiving than the 57's - by quite a bit actually. The 53's were engineered to provide more help on toe, and high toe mishits. The 57's will cost you distance with this type ...

2007年12月17日 · I have some MP-60's/MP-32 combo set that I really like with Project X 5.5 in the MP-60's and X100's in the MP-32's. Later in the year I switched to all MP-60's because of a minor shoulder injury. I hit the 60's well and generally I was happy with them but seemed to hit the 8-PW way tooo high for my liking (and the windy conditions that I play in!).

2007年8月28日 · I agree. I find the MP-60 looks better to me, and I prefer the thinner sole over the wider sole of the MP-57. I said when I first saw the 57 that it made no sense to me, but was told it was slotted between the 60 and the 25. I still don't get it. In the meantime, I'll stick with the 60's as gamers, and occassionally play my 67's.

2008年10月22日 · The new MP-62 is a beautiful iron, but IMO pretty similar as the MP 57 in size, grind, forgivness. The main difference is the feel. MP-57 feel a bit harsher, the MP-62 more solid.

2011年2月3日 · I currently own the MP-57's and was thinking of reshafting from S300 to X100 because I find S300 a tad too soft for my swing. I ordered some X100 shafts and i'm planning on doing the reshafting soon. I came across the MP-53's and have heard that they are more forgiving without sacrificing feel over the MP-57's. and the MP-57's were/are pretty ...

2008年11月9日 · I have had Mizuno MP 30, 37, 57 and now 52. All had similar feel (some smoother than others), the only one that stood out as not quite up to snuff was the MP 57. I think the main problem was the 57's had Project X shafts which were harsh feeling and hit the ball sky high. The MP 52 with DG S300 is a great club and feels great.

2008年8月12日 · The difference in offset and sole width is minimal between the two sets as well. Anyone wanting to transition from the MX-23 to the MP-57 wouldn't have a problem at all. It should be noted that I also considered getting the MP-60 irons but the difference in appearance between this iron and the MX-23 was more significant.