Aug 5, 2008 · Microsoft's MVP pattern renders re-use of Views much more difficult and conveniently excuses Microsoft's designer from encouraging bad practice. To be perfectly frank, I think the underlying concerns of MVC hold true for any MVP implementation and the differences are almost entirely semantic.

Aug 23, 2009 · Typically you hear this pattern discussion come up when discussing the ASP.NET MVC framework, and come across information regarding the MVP pattern and it's implementation in ASP.NET WebForms. It is common in my experience that it is believed that WebForms is in and of itself an MVP patterned framework - this is not true.

Jul 7, 2012 · MVP is my favorite design pattern to create a UI. The big difference between MVP and MVC is how to handle the view. In MVC, the Controller manipulates the view, taking care of how to render in the view parts of the user actions and model. That means that the Controller and View have 'tight coupling'.

Jan 18, 2013 · @nawfal: Having presenter and view in one project still allows you to unit test the presenter independently of the view which is the whole point of MVP. The view interfaces and presenters should be organized in folders anyway so refactoring out to a separate project when needed (e.g. changing view engines) wouldn't be that difficult.

In either pattern the Model can't depend on any other components. 'Has references' only to Observer objects. It doesn't care if those observers are views, controllers or other models. MVC is the most misquoted design pattern and lacks a real definition. I'm going to use the one published by Martin Fowler.

Feb 19, 2012 · Finally, the word model has a very specific meaning in MVC, MVP, and MVVM in the context of a view. In that context it means that particular data object associated with a view, the view model. This could be one of your domain objects, but more typically it is a view-specific object that encapsulates data from one or more domain objects along ...

Apr 1, 2015 · Some people will start talking about design pattern, architectural or even architectural presentation patterns. I'm reaching the conclusion that they are all architectural presentation pattern but MvC is an architectural pattern while MvP & MvvM are design pattern on the same rank as something like the design pattern observer.

Apr 4, 2011 · I've recently started looking at using the MVP design pattern for writing winforms applications, and am a little stuck on how to structure some things. For example, I have an app that displays some records in a list; the user can then select from this list and click a "Copy" button, which copies files that relate to these records.

Aug 4, 2015 · I just have started to use MVP design pattern on Windows Form Application. I have structured my code into 3 folders (Model, View, Presenter), and I have managed to build my UI so far.

The Model-View-ViewModel (MVVM) Pattern is a design pattern. Per definition a design pattern shows a common solution in the object-oriented world and this solution can be applied in various platforms (WPF, WinForms, Java Swing, etc.). I agree that MVVM is best used with WPF because it leverages the strong binding capabilities.