
Maia v. IEW Construction Group :: 2024 - Justia Law
The case involves plaintiffs Christopher Maia and Sean Howarth, who were employed as laborers for defendant IEW Construction Group. The company required them to perform “pre-shift” and “post-shift” work, for which they were not paid. Both Maia and Howarth were laid off …
NJ Supreme Court Clarifies Statute of Limitations under the Wage …
2024年10月7日 · In Christopher Maia v. IEW Construction Group (A-3-23/088010) (May 15, 2024), the Supreme Court of New Jersey clarified the statute of limitations under the Wage Theft Act, holding that the 2019 law does not apply retroactively.
On April 13, 2022, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, plaintiffs Christopher Maia and Sean Howarth filed a complaint alleging defendant IEW Construction Group had violated
New Jersey Supreme Court Holds Wage Theft Act Can Only Be …
2024年5月17日 · The court distinguished the Maia case from W.S. v. Hildreth, a 2023 Supreme Court ruling relied upon by the Appellate Division, which retroactively applied the amendments of a statute for allegations of sexual assault.
Maia v. IEW Constr. Grp., 475 N.J. Super. 44 - Casetext
2023年3月1日 · On April 13, 2022, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, plaintiffs Christopher Maia and Sean Howarth filed a complaint alleging defendant IEW Construction Group had violated the Wage and Hour Law (WHL), N.J.S.A. 34:11-56a to -56a41, and the Wage Payment Law (WPL), N.J.S.A. 34:11-4.1 to -4.14, by failing to pay them for "pre ...
CHRISTOPHER MAIA, ET AL. VS. IEW CONSTRUCTION GROUP
On April 13, 2022, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, plaintiffs Christopher Maia and Sean Howarth filed a complaint alleging defendant IEW Construction Group had violated the Wage and Hour Law (WHL), N.J.S.A. 34:11-56a to -56a41, and the Wage Payment Law (WPL), N.J.S.A. 34:11-4.1 to -4.14, by failing to pay them for "pre ...
2A:14-1.1, the law protecting architects, builders, and others from lawsuits seeking damages for design or construction or related deficiencies, is an acknowledged statute of repose because it states that “[n]o action ... shall be brought ... more than 10 years after ... construction.” See Greczyn v. Colgate-Palmolive, 183 N.J. 5, 14
Maia v. Commissioner of Correction :: 2023 - Justia Law
Petitioner was convicted of murder and sentenced to sixty-years' imprisonment. Petitioner later brought his habeas petition, claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel.
Maia v. IEW Constr. Group | New Jersey Law Journal
2023年3月1日 · Plaintiffs appealed the trial court's grant of defendant's partial motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs filed suit alleging that defendant, their employer, had violated the New Jersey Wage and Hour...
MAIA v. IEW CONST. GROUP | 291 A.3d... | 20230301283 - Leagle
2023年1月24日 · On April 13, 2022, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, plaintiffs Christopher Maia and Sean Howarth filed a complaint alleging defendant IEW Construction Group had violated the Wage and Hour Law (WHL), N.J.S.A. 34:11-56a to -56a41, and the Wage Payment Law (WPL...