Won't is simply a contraction of the words will not. They have the exact same meaning. Won't is more informal; if you're writing an essay, in most cases you're advised not to use any contractions. Beyond that, there's no reason not to choose whichever you like. More often when speaking, you'll hear won't. So if you're writing dialogue, you ...

It's not just about the USA Swimming Team or even Team USA. I was at the USA Science and Engineering Festival here in Washington, D.C. It was very exciting. The USA TODAY/ESPN Board of Coaches is made up of 31 coaches at Division I institutions. As for sentences not using the article before USA, I found the following ones:

2025年1月23日 · The possibility of divine punishment. Basically anything I could think of, but all predicated on the fact that I am talking to someone who by definition will be unlikely to be persuaded by arguments that are not consequentialist. This does not, however, mean that I myself refrain from stealing simply due to the bad things that might happen to me.

2020年7月12日 · It is rare, and dated. (so normally a learner should not use this). It has much the same meaning as "merely", or "no more than" and is used in humble expression when speaking about oneself: I'm merely common man, and nothing more. So it does mean "I am a common man". So when applied to others, it is disparaging.

It has to be read as poetic language. It's evocative, unsettling, and striking, rather than explicit. Fighting monsters making a hero monstrous is not an uncommon trope, for instance it can be found in Beowulf where the hero progressively takes more of the characteristics and language previously reserved for monsters - with allegorical insights stored eg against hording treasure …

This one is not grammatical (except for an unusual situation described below): Do you know what is it? The key to understanding this is to see that what it is is not a question. It's just the object of know. What is it? is a question, but there's only one question here, not a question within a question. As a declarative statement, you would say:

2020年1月12日 · It is not uncommon to say “at this moment in time” too, which has always struck me as overkill. While @KateBunting is correct, my feeling is that these expressions all overlap to quite a considerable extent. Only context can tell us which to use. –

'Has' is not the raw or primary verb. This is different from the notion of saying "She has a book/books" or "I have a book/books". Here the concept of using 'do' as an auxiliary verb is not present. However, making a negative out of it certainly requires the addition of the auxiliary verb.

Earn 10 reputation (not counting the association bonus) in order to answer this question. The reputation requirement helps protect this question from spam and non-answer activity. The reputation requirement helps protect this question from spam and non-answer activity.

2018年7月4日 · I haven't seen the show quoted in the OP, but it sounds like this is a man and woman planning a blind date, and the woman wants to clarify that the man is not hairy all over his body. Otherwise, I think something akin to, "As long as you mean that metaphorically..." would have been more appropriate. –