Researcher reflexivity, essentially a researcher’s insight into their own biases and rationale for decision-making as the study progresses, is critical to rigor. This article reviews common standards of rigor, quality scholarship criteria, and best practices for qualitative research from design through dissemination.

2020年1月1日 · This qualitative, explorative study, aimed for research rigor by conducting semistructured and coded interviews and further with awareness of how to reduce research bias as recommended by Gill...

2024年12月9日 · Rigor, in the context of qualitative research, refers to the trustworthiness, credibility, and overall quality of the research process and findings. It is about ensuring that the research design, methods, and conclusions are robust, transparent, and free from bias, maximizing the accuracy and trustworthiness of the result.

This article presents the concept of rigor in qualitative research using a phenomenological study as an exemplar to further illustrate the process. Elaborating on epistemological and theoretical conceptualizations by Lincoln and Guba, strategies congruent with qualitative perspective for ensuring validity to establish the credibility of the ...

Rigor will be first defined followed by how “reliability and validity” should be applied to qualitative research methods during the inquiry (constructive) rather than only post hoc evaluation. Strategies to attain reliability and validity will be described including the criteria and techniques for ensuring its attainment in a study.

2021年9月18日 · Using a systematic search strategy, published journal articles that deliberate criteria for rigorous research were identified. Then, references of relevant articles were surveyed to find noteworthy, distinct, and well-defined pointers to good qualitative research.

We discuss the implications of our framework for increasing rigor in qualitative analysis, for actively constructing categories from data, and for spurring more methodological plurality with-in qualitative theory building. Qualitative analysis is a central tool for developing new theory (Edmondson & McManus, 2007; Eisen-hardt, 1989).

Numerous studies have been published on the rigor of qualitative research, presenting both shared and differing concepts, definitions, and approaches. In this editorial on rigor in qualitative research, the author aims to clarify these concepts by

We discuss the implications of our framework for increasing rigor in qualitative analysis, for actively constructing categories from data, and for spurring more methodological plurality within qualitative theory building.

Researcher reflexivity, essentially a researcher's insight into their own biases and rationale for decision-making as the study progresses, is critical to rigor. This article reviews common standards of rigor, quality scholarship criteria, and best practices for qualitative research from design through dissemination.