2014年8月8日 · I need to know how to list the IDs of all route tables. For example, I can run: ip rule add fwmark 2 table 104 ip route add dev eth0 default via 192.168.3.7 table 104 A call to ip rule list shows...

2020年3月10日 · The IF at the end is a reference to a list of interfaces that show at the top of the route PRINT -4 command which looks like this:

2013年5月24日 · Since you know everything else about the adaptor, and since you are using Server 2008, you can (and should) just add your routes with netsh using the interface name: netsh int ipv4 add route <remote netid>/<remote netmask> <interface name> <next hop> Use of the route command is generally deprecated in 2008+.

Stop using the netstat and route commands, they will just confuse you and they don't have the necessary functionality anyway. To view the basic IPv4 routing table: ip route To view a specific table: ip route list table test1 To view everything: ip route list table all

I have tried: route add 192.168.0.6 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.10 if 13 Here is a print of my interfaces: When I add the static route to the table, it doesn't show the specified interface, only associate it to the gateway. Is it correct?

Use the commands netsh interface ipv4 show route to see the list of routes, and netsh interface ipv4 show interface to see the list of interfaces. The route 0.0.0.0/0 always is the default route and points to the default gateway.

I'm having difficulty to configure a route-map with multiple matches in AND operation. The issue is, both match criteria are against ACL, but different ACL. What I want to do is route-map TEST p...

2009年7月30日 · ip route show default should do the trick for the default gateway, or you can use ip route get <someip> to see what the route for a particular IP address is.

2017年7月19日 · The next hop you are trying to add in the route is not in the same subnet as the computer you are trying to configure the route in. That is, 192.168.61.200 netmask 255.255.255.0 covers only addresses from 192.168.61.1 to 192.168.61.254, and you have to use an address in that network for your next hop. Maybe your Windows computer has a different netmask which also covers the 192.168.16.0/24 ...

route is a fairly simple tool, perfect for creating static routes. It's still present in many distributions for compatibility. ip route is much more powerful, it has much more functionality, and can create more specialized rules. ip route isn't needed to create a static route, but as it's a much more useful tool, the effort expended in learning it and its syntax is definitely time well spent.