
Flash Briefing: SCP-4999, "Someone to watch over us" - Reddit
2019年5月18日 · SCP-4999 is a humanoid entity of unknown composition, visually resembling a middle-aged male. Its physical appearance varies, with its dark suit being the only constant …
4999 : r/SCP - Reddit
7.3K votes, 169 comments. 714K subscribers in the SCP community. Secure, Contain, Protect | Official subreddit of the SCP Wiki collaborative-fiction…
SCP-4999 Someone To Watch Over Us : r/SCP - Reddit
5.8K votes, 115 comments. 707K subscribers in the SCP community. Secure, Contain, Protect | Official subreddit of the SCP Wiki collaborative-fiction…
Why is 4999 Keter? : r/SCP - Reddit
The class has more to do with the difficulty of containing an SCP. 4999 isn’t dangerous, but because he only appears to people dying alone and then dematerializes, there really isn’t a …
I think SCP-4999 is one of the best scps that shown up in a
2019年2月19日 · I heard the conspiracy that the reason why SCP-4000 got it's place was because it threw in as many GoI references, cognitohazards, information hazards, and SCP …
SCP-4999 : r/SCP - Reddit
2022年10月26日 · SCP-4999 - Someone to Watch Over Us (+2252) by CadaverCommander. Reply reply BasedAlliance935 ...
Scp-4999 Art : r/SCP - Reddit
2019年12月19日 · 5.3K votes, 135 comments. 688K subscribers in the SCP community. Secure, Contain, Protect | Official subreddit of the SCP Wiki collaborative-fiction…
SCP-4999 : r/SCP - Reddit
4999 is one of the biggest bros of all the anomalies, especially for something totally uncontainable (or even uncontactable, really). Reply reply massivefaliure
How do scp danger ratings work : r/SCP - Reddit
2019年10月16日 · The ACS system that they are trying out, is right on SCP-4999's page. It says that SCP-4999 is Clearance: level 3/Confidential Containment: Keter Class Disruption: Enki …
SCP-4999 : r/SCP - Reddit
The wiki cites a teleporting cat as an example of a Keter level SCP. And this is pretty similar to that. The article cites the SCP's "rules" for when it appears as a form of "self-containment", but …