data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9603/a9603b49f77c7cf4c0f7d03ebcc0f87c392c82dd" alt=""
Texas v. Johnson | Oyez
In 1984, in front of the Dallas City Hall, Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag as a means of protest against Reagan administration policies. Johnson was tried and convicted under a Texas law outlawing flag desecration. He was sentenced to …
Facts and Case Summary - Texas v. Johnson - United States Courts
A Texas court tried and convicted Johnson. He appealed, arguing that his actions were "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment. The Supreme Court agreed to hear his case.
Texas v. Johnson - Wikipedia
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that burning the Flag of the United States was protected speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as doing so counts as symbolic speech and political speech.
Texas v. Johnson | Summary, Background, & Significance ...
Texas v. Johnson, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5–4) on June 21, 1989, that the burning of the U.S. flag is a protected form of speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989) - Justia US Supreme ...
Texas v. Johnson: The First Amendment protections on symbolic speech prevent states from banning desecrations of the American flag.
Texas v. Johnson - Case Summary and Case Brief - Legal Dictionary
2017年3月16日 · Texas v. Johnson Case Brief. Statement of the Facts: Gregory Lee Johnson was convicted for desecrating a flag after publically burning an American flag in political protest at a Republican rally. Johnson then challenged his conviction under the Texas state law in a state court claiming the law violated his First Amendment right to freedom of ...
Texas v. Johnson (1989) - The National Constitution Center
In Texas v. Johnson, a divided Supreme Court held that burning the flag was protected expression under the First Amendment. The case was decided twenty years after the birth of the “counterculture” movement, fifteen years after the end of the Vietnam War, and in the midst of the Cold War, although that was soon coming to an end.