
clustering - K-means: Why minimizing WCSS is maximizing …
From a conceptual and algorithmic standpoint, I understand how K-means works. However, from a mathematical standpoint, I don't understand why minimizing the WCSS (within-cluster sums of squares) will necessarily maximize the distance between clusters.
kMeans - acceptable value for WCSS - Cross Validated
$\begingroup$ chl: to answer briefly your questions - yes, i used it (kmeans of weka) on the same data set. firstly and secondly, with all 21 attributes - different k arguments 'of course' -> bad wcss value. afterwards weka/kmeans was applied with three selected attributes using different arguments for k (in the range 2-10). however, using rapidminer (another data mining software) …
What does minimising the loss function mean in k-means clustering?
2020年9月17日 · The centroids are then updated after the points are all assigned, and points are re-assigned again. The algorithm continues to iterate until the clusters do not change anymore. The algorithm tries to minimise the within-cluster sum of squares (WCSS) value which is a measure of the variance within the clusters.
clustering - Why is the k-means algorithm minimizing the within …
I have read that the k-means algorithm tries to minimize the within cluster sum of squares (or variance). With some brainstorming, a question popped up. Why is it that k-means or any other clustering
r - What should be the ideal number of clusters for the plot whose ...
2016年1月20日 · Furthermore, WCSS is expected to decrease with the number of clusters. Even just assigning a single point to a new cluster obvioudly decreases WCSS, but foes not yield a better clustering. So if you don't see a clear 'outlier' where the curve drops a lot and then abruptly stops dropping, then something did not work .
r - Comparison of k-means clustering output - Cross Validated
2013年3月4日 · Hence when I give k=2, the output perfect matches with R's. In fact, the output is perfect for k=3 and k=4 too (I use 'nstart' to get the best output). But for k=5 and above, the values are varying. The total WCSS for R's kmeans for k=5 was …
clustering k-means spark-mllib - Cross Validated
2018年8月2日 · Never compare WCSS across different data versions or data sets. It's trivial to see that scaling all attributes by a factor of 2 does not affect the clustering, but changes the WCSS by a factor of 4. So you can arbitrarily inflate WCSS - or …
machine learning - In k-means clustering, why sum of squared …
2019年4月12日 · Stack Exchange Network. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
How to find the optimal number of clusters for spectral clustering ...
2017年10月23日 · Now that you've figured out what WCSS is visually, you'll see that the WCSS is high at the beginning and you'll notice it drop substantially and then after a while, it will still drop but there won't be any substantial change. That point where the last big drop is, that's the optimal number of clusters.
What do you do when there's no elbow point for kmeans clustering
2014年3月12日 · Stack Exchange Network. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.