2021年9月15日 · If Janelle determined that KL bisects MKJ, this implies that x = y. Therefore: x + x = 80° 2 x = 80° x = 40° This would also mean that y = 40°. Since both smaller angles are equal at 40°, it confirms that ray KL indeed bisects the angle MKJ. Conclusion Janelle's conclusion is correct if she indeed found that m ∠ M K L = m ∠ L J K = 40 ...

The measure of angle MKJ is 80°, and if ray KL bisects the angle, it means that ray KL divides the angle into two equal parts. Following the theorem that states if a ray stands on a line, then the sum of the two adjacent angles so formed is equal to 180°, we can conclude that if KL bisects MKJ, then ∠LKM is congruent to ∠LKJ, each being 40°.

2019年1月28日 · Angle MKJ measures 80 degrees, and since KL is the angle bisector, it divides MKJ into two equal angles measuring 40 degrees each. Therefore, angle MKL and angle LJK both measure 40 degrees. Janelle's conclusion about KL being the angle bisector is correct.

2019年1月28日 · To find the measure of angle MKJ and confirm Janelle's conclusion that KL is an angle bisector, let's analyze the information given step by step. We know that the measure of angle ∠MKJ = 80°. Since KL is identified as an angle …

2024年1月23日 · Janelle's conclusion that ray KL is an angle bisector of angle MKJ is incorrect because the equation 2x10 = 3x(-5) is not true for any value of x, demonstrating that the two angles MKL and LKJ are not congruent as required for an angle bisector. Explanation: The question involves analyzing angles and the concept of an angle bisector in geometry.

Janelle's conclusion is correct because the value of x is 15, which satisfies the angle relationships given in the problem. The equation set with the measure of angle MKJ confirms that KL is indeed an angle bisector. Therefore, her conclusion holds true based on the calculations.

Janelle's conclusion is correct because the sum of the measures of angles LKM and LKJ is equal to the measure of angle MKJ. Hence the correct option is (Her conclusion is correct because m_LKM + m_LKJ = m_MKJ.). Explanation: The statement that best describes Janelle's **conclusion **is: Her conclusion is correct because m_LKM + m_LKJ = m_MKJ.

2021年4月5日 · To find the measure of angle MKJ in the triangle LMK, we can use the property that the sum of all angles in a triangle is 180 degrees. We know the measures of angles LMK and KLM: m LMK = 26° m KLM = 33° First, we add the two known angles: m LMK + …

2023年12月28日 · We have the measure of angle MKJ as 80°, angle MKL as 20°, and angle LKJ as -15°. An angle bisector divides an angle into two halves. However, since the given values of the angles are different and the measure of one angle is negative, which is not possible for an angle measure, Janelle's conclusion about ray KL being an angle bisector must ...

Click here 👆 to get an answer to your question ️ KM bisects ∠LKJ. If m∠LKM = 4x + 12 and m∠MKJ = 6x - 6, find the value of x.