
Dynamic Routing Protocols: OSPF, EIGRP, RIPv2, IS-IS, BGP
2021年12月4日 · Table 4 RIPv1 vs RIPv2 Comparison RIPv2 is an enhancement to the protocol standard that was designed to fix some of the problems with RIPv1. The primary difference is that RIPv2 is a classless protocol that includes subnet mask information with routing updates. That enables the same classless subnetting that OSPF, EIGRP, IS-IS and BGP support.
BGP vs OSPF - Cisco Community
2002年9月9日 · Can somebody tell me which one is better BGP or OSPF. We have a enterprise network using OSPF but somebody suggested to go for BGP. Wanted to take suggestions on the same. Thanks SM
BGP vs OSPF - Cisco Community
2007年6月16日 · In technical terms OSPF is used within an autonomous system, an autonomous system being a network under the administrative control of one organisation. BGP is an EGP (Exterior Gateway Protocol) whose primary use is to exchange routing information between autonmous systems and not for routing within an autonomous system, although the waters get ...
BGP vs OSPF bs EIGRP (EGP vs IGP) - Cisco Community
2013年8月7日 · Posting OSPF and EIGRP likely do more "computation" per "route" than BGP and they probably have much worse exponential computation growth, so it's a scalability issue. For details of why there's a disparity, you would need to analyze the path selection algorithm and what their mathematical computation work formula is.
BGP and OSPF - Cisco Community
2024年3月21日 · Unlike OSPF, don't believe BGP supports "wildcarding" its network statements to include networks, so between the network statements and peering statements, config does start to grow, e.g.:
BGP vs. OSPF - Cisco Community
2009年3月20日 · I need a better information on BGP vs. OSPF We have a enterprise network, all locations connected through MPLS and DMVPN for internet and BGP was running on both links. Recently one third party guy Mr. Thomas advised my management (who helped at starting this network build) to convert from BGP to O...
OSPF route preferred over BGP route - Cisco Community
2021年5月2日 · Hi, In the network below, the objective is redundant reachability to prefix 1.1.1.1 (say public cloud hosting) routers csr2 and csr3 (internal network). In the order of operations, BGP was configured and verified first, followed by OSPF configuration. The working state is like this - …
OSPF vs. BGP and MPLS - Cisco Community
2002年4月24日 · I'm somewhat familiar with OSPF, having worked in an environment where it was used as the interior routing protocol. I'm unfamiliar with BFP but I'm working a project where BGP may be required. I understand that BGP has been modified to permit it to work with MPLS. Is the same true of OSPF? Second ...
BGP vs OSPF - Cisco Community
2010年11月5日 · Hello Winston, you can run BGP and OSPF on the same device but all depends on what you want to achieve: if the BGP session with provider A is an eBGP session the routes learned on it are preferred for their lower admin distance (20) in comparison to OSPF (110). So if you want to use the connection with ISP B as a secondary path to be used when link to ISP A fails you are fine. Things are more ...
Prefer a route learned via OSPF rather than BGP
2014年8月28日 · Hi All, I learning a route via BGP and OSPF ( via two separate links ) I cant figure out the "best" way to configure the router to prefer the route via OSPF over BGP and if OSPF link fails, it would then use the BGP route. Its currently learned via BGP 199.199.199.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets B...