2014年12月16日 · Won't we need exponential space in order to beat the upperbound for the total number of system configurations achievable with space that scales polynomially with input …

2019年7月3日 · In terms of complexity classes: $$\textsf{TIME}(t) \subseteq \textsf{SPACE}(t)$$ Both $\textsf{P} \subseteq \textsf{PSPACE}$ and $\textsf{EXPTIME} \subseteq …

$\begingroup$ Because i live in bad country, I can't prove it , I tried to use the definitions of pspace , I manged to prove that p is contained in pspace but I could not find the Relationship …

2016年6月1日 · How is the time hierarchy theorem (or anything else) used to prove that P≠EXPTIME? If we assume P=NP and NP=EXP, P=EXP and that contradicts P≠EXP. So one …

A number of EXPTIME-complete problems are listed here. They include some interesting ones about games ...

There are NP-hard problems that are not in EXPTIME and vice versa. This is to be expected as NP-hard is defined by a lower bound and EXPTIME mainly by an upper bound. NP is …

2016年4月22日 · Any problem in NP is in EXPTIME because you can either use exponential time to try all possible certificates or to enumerate all possible computation paths of a …

EXPTIME is an example of a super-polynomial time complexity class. Also please tell me what is the deference between super-polynomial and polynomial times in context of polynomial …

I am wondering if there are known to be any EXPTIME-complete problems (or even just problems in EXPTIME) which are known to also be in IP, so a prover can convince a verifier that an …

2022年1月6日 · $\begingroup$ No problem is known to be in $\mathsf{EXPTIME}$ and not in $\mathsf{NP}$ so I don't know what you expect… $\endgroup$ – Nathaniel Commented Jan 6, …