2008年7月21日 · In addition to the seller's statutory duty to provide the completed Form 17 disclosure statement, the seller is obligated to disclose all material facts relating to the property known by the seller. The presence of extensive dry rot would appear to be a material fact. The next question is whether the seller knew or should have known of the dry rot.

2013年1月23日 · p.s. Question 17 on the form allows for a brief statement of reasons why custody would be in the best interests of the child. You could attach an addendum, but I would keep the answer there very general and bare-bones, not go into chapter and verse about why you feel you are the better parent (unless there are documented instances of abuse ...

2015年8月25日 · Buyers have a right to rely on the seller's disclosures in the Form 17. However, if defects are apparent or the buyer has knowledge of issues from an inspection, the buyer must make further inquiry. Buyers should carefully review the Form 17 and ask questions of the seller if there are ambiguities or the explanations are not clear.

2017年9月1日 · My friend overstayed her tourist visa; she got married to her USC boyfriend and they are now filing her I-485. However, she is not sure if she should answer yes to question 17 on Part 8 which asks is you "have ever violated the terms or conditions of her non-immigrant status". She has never worked while being a tourist but she did overstay her ...

2020年7月6日 · The corresponding Form Interrogatory 17.1 has been pre-approved by the Judicial Council, so there are very few if any valid reasons to object. The Judicial Council thinks its relevant, so an objection based on lack of relevance isn't valid either.

With regard to questions 1 and 2, generally speaking the only repaired defects that a seller has to disclose on the Form 17 are roof leaks and settlement issues. Other than those, if you have repaired a problem using a qualified contractor, you do not have a disclosure obligation.

2015年7月30日 · The PR is absolutely exempt. The chapter does not apply to Personal Representatives of Estates--that is, there is no duty to provide a Form 17 when an Estate sells real property. That statute you cite, RCW 64.06.010(6), is correct.

2012年12月30日 · Not sure what you mean by boilerplate objections in this instance. Did the responding party provide any response to 17.1 with respect to the request for admissions, notwithstanding the objections? "Where the question is specific and explicit, an answer that supplies only a portion of the information sought is improper." (Weil & Brown, Civ. Proc.

2012年8月3日 · the idea was to serve form #17.1 with 35 requests for admissions and avoid serving a Declaration of Necessity and also serve a Request for Production of Documents for all documents listed in your answers to form Interrogatory 17.1(d). I am a party to unlawful detainer action and the amount demanded is less than $25,000

2018年11月6日 · Form interrogatory 17.1 is generally served with a set of Requests for Admission. It asks that a party who responded to the set of Requests for Admission provide further information about any request that he or she did …