2019年12月8日 · 一、拉丁文 ius与lex. 1. 按照罗马法学家乌尔比安的解释，意指“法”的ius源自意指“正义”的iustitia。与ius相关的派生词包括just，justice。 2. 按照伊西多尔的解释，意指“法律”或“制定法”的lex涉及两个词源关系。与lex相关的派生词包括legal，legality，legalize。 3.

The ius, also known as ius consumendi, builds on the Roman ius utendi, asserting that not only does a possessor have the right to use his property as he sees fit, but also to consume it. This ius establishes that Christ and the apostles "had the right to use, use up, sell, donate or …

2010年12月14日 · Looking at a Latin dictionary, both "ius" and "lex" seem to refer to about the same things. From usage during the Roman republic, I know that lex refers to a law enacted at a certain place by a certain imperium holder (e.g., lex publilia). However, I'm …

它区别于ius，后者指的是带有天然正义意味的法律，带有褒义。 如果细细探究，ius更接近汉语（或者说文言文）的“法”，而lex更适合翻译成“律”。 围绕这个词有很多著名的拉丁语法谚，仅举一例：de minimis non curat lex，法律不关心琐事。

Lex is law made by a political authority, such as a parliament or a government. In modern societies, leges are usually written, though this is not a necessary feature. Lex is often used in the plural (leges), since each act is one lex. On the other hand, ius is also polysemous, since it can mean either law or right.

莱利乌斯所讲的“真正的法”不同于通俗意义上的法的定义——即人所制定的各项成文法规，用来处理具体事务（如市民法[ius civile]、宗教法和地方性法规）。

2019年9月30日 · （1）《十二表法》内（第5表第3条和第6表第1条）以ius一词指称私法裁决的地方（ 例如in ius vocat，in ius ducito，in iure vindicit） ； 十二表法早就已经消失，但是学说汇编中有很多地方都引用过其内容（其中提到ius一词的片段包括： D.2，4，18，0； D.2，4，20，0； D.2 ...

2025年1月22日 · “Ius” and “lex naturalis” (natural law) both address principles of justice but differ in origin and application. “Ius” is rooted in human legal systems, representing rights and principles that guide judicial reasoning. In contrast, “lex naturalis” refers to universal moral principles inherent in human nature, transcending human ...

ius，一个眼看就要烂大街的 拉丁文 词，意为“法”； 不要把它和下面的“LEX”相混淆，意为“律”。 如果说 “IUS”属于眼看烂大街，那下边这个词基本上无论认不认识拉丁文都一定听说过：

By distinguishing between law (lex) and justice (ius) we are able to focus on different aspects of both command and right. Thus, unlike Kelsen,54 I see the fundamental element of law not as hierarchically ordered “norms”.