
Remove Real shatter - War Thunder - Official Forum
2023年7月13日 · I’m quite familiar with the Ki-200, boasting a K/D ratio of 6.67 with over 2,000 takedowns. I am, therefore, well-positioned to evaluate the current performance of the aircraft. However, following the recent updates and changes in Battle Rating (BR), the Ki-200 is now at a severe disadvantage. The Ki-200 is a very specific kind of beast.
Why KI-200, Me 163 B-0, Yak-23, Venom's BR is still located on …
2025年2月21日 · Before making any further remarks, what I would like to say is that in order for KI-200, Me 163 B-0, and Venom FB-4 to be maintained at 8.7, all F-86 and MIG-15/17 series must be at least 0.7 BR higher than the current BR. If the fuel was 6 minutes as before, The Me 163 would have been very powerful against jets between 7.0 and 8.0.
Japan jet BR is too high. Howcome Ki-200 is 9.3 while Mig-21 S is …
2025年1月10日 · The Me 163 is 8.0 and has drastically more effective armament. Ki-200 used to be a very good plane back when the guns worked and supersonics weren’t added yet. Yeah, every plane with Ho-155 is basically useless now. Thing like Ki-84 Hei is literally 1 whole br above its flight performance because its Ho-155 used to be good like 2 years ago ...
3 minutes of fuel in the 163? - War Thunder - Official Forum
2024年12月17日 · Dying to Me 163 & Ki-200 in a much faster jet is equivalent to “Erm… I died to A6M2 in my P-51C” in prop tier. Unless the player is already chased by superior planes so that a chasing me 163 catches up to the last resort turn fight. Anyway, the same thing happens in the prop tier though.
Me 163 fuel time - Aircraft - War Thunder — official forum
2025年2月15日 · Not long ago the me 163/ki-200 have got nerfed Fuel time It went from maximum 6 minutes to only 4 Which is maybe historically accurate I am not hear to discuss that. But the gameplay is changed for worse moving it in br or giving it an air spawn might solve this problem Specially the one in 8.7 you will find yourself in bigger maps that’s Will waste most of …
What camos are all accessible in the Warbonds shop?
2024年10月19日 · Hey y’all, apologies if this is the wrong place to ask this, but I wasn’t sure where else to put it. I just purchased one of the Warbonds Camo crates and got a user created camo, the Prototype #403 camo for the Ki-200 (props to whoever made that by the way. I only play the Japanese Air Tech Tree so getting a nifty skin for one of their few jets is awesome!). …
Why KI-200, Me 163 B-0, Yak-23, Venom's BR is still located on …
2023年11月25日 · Personally, I think Venom FB.4 at 8.7 it’s suffer because another aircraft 8.7 ~ 9.0 BR armed Air-to-Air Missile and some match meet uptier aircraft 9.7 but de Havilland DH 112 Venom FB.4 never carry Air-to-Air Missile, so it should down to 8.3 BR this year or Q1 2024
The Ki200 is horrible - War Thunder - Official Forum
2024年8月5日 · This thing is horrible, it’s a worse me163 in every single aspect and yet it sits at a higher BR. The guns are awful, it’s slower, has less engine power, turns worse, compresses more, and yet it sits at 0.7 br higher. If the japanese 30mm’s were any good it would be kind of justified, but they are now some of the absolute worst cannons across the entire game. The …
Mitsubishi J8M1 Shusui - Aircraft - War Thunder — official forum
2024年12月1日 · Mitsubishi began construction of powered prototypes, designated J8M1 for the Navy and Ki-200 for the Army. The first prototype was completed in June 1945 and underwent checks at Yokosuka. The maiden flight took place on July 7, 1945, but the engine failed during a steep climb, leading to a crash and the death of Lieut-Cdr Inuzuka. The ...
BI-1 Is Pay-to-Win and needs to be dealt with - War Thunder
2024年5月9日 · The only people who would disagree are either BI owners with a big investment, or players who take a cursory glance at the fuel load and haven’t flown a Ki-200 or Komet before. Typically, a successful engagement against a BI in a prop is not so much “won” as it is “survived”.
- 某些结果已被删除