2000年2月1日 · Any new opinions on this matter? RG-11 doesn't look too much more expensive. I'm going to be running coax from four satellites, with four cables from two satellite dish (dual …

2004年4月20日 · With RG11, you'll gain permanently distorted connectors on your equipment, more difficult to run cable, harder to make connections, more expensive tools and connectors, …

2009年4月7日 · This kit comes with 75' of RG6 coax cable. However, I'm hearing that RG6 quad shielded cable would provide less signal loss or interference for Over-The-Air (OTA) reception. …

2024年6月19日 · I didn't know bending a belden RG6 twin shield cable 90 degrees (actually probably more like 100 degrees) was bad until now. I was also kind of rough installing the …

2008年6月21日 · Using RG11 (or RG6 for that matter), is there any real advantage paying more for a solid copper center and copper shield vs copper clad steel as far as loss? Also, does that …

2004年10月14日 · BACK to the original question for sure then, what distances can RG7/RG11 be used without signifigant loss in quality. Looks like we'll have to go some 300-400 odd feet with …

2008年6月4日 · Anyway, I got the RG11 for $20 and the crimp connectors for 87 cents for a package of 2. The only crimp tool that was designed for RG11 size cable cost about $80. So I …

2007年5月29日 · rg11 75' run rg6 -4.5db rg11 - 3 db difference ~1 db I can see adding rg 11 if the coax run is long well over 150' and the antenna of higher performance . but this scenario is like …

2005年4月18日 · It is more flexible and easier to work with than RG6 and is well shielded. While interfering signals on an analog baseband application are perhaps more likely than digital …

2001年1月21日 · Definitely give the existing a shot at it first. There's no sense in doing extra work if it can handle the task. If you were starting from scratch, then I would definitely say to go …