RULE 124. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 1 Voluntary Binding Arbitration: The parties may move that any factual issue in controversy be resolved through voluntary binding arbitration. Such a motion may be made at any time after a case is at issue and before trial.

Application of certain rules in civil to criminal cases. — The provisions of Rules 42, 44 to 46 and 48 to 56 relating to procedure in the Court of Appeals and in the Supreme Court in original and appealed civil cases shall be applied to criminal cases insofar as they are applicable and not inconsistent with the provisions of this Rule. (18a)

Under T.C. Rule 124, the parties may move that any factual issue in controversy be resolved through binding arbitration. The motion may be made before trial at any time after the case is at issue.

Rule 124 - No Judgment without Service. In no case shall judgment be rendered against any defendant unless upon service, or acceptance or waiver of process, or upon an appearance by the defendant, as prescribed in these rules, except …

The Lawphil Project provides comprehensive rules and procedures for criminal cases in the Philippines.

General rule.—The application for reargument need not be set forth in numbered paragraphs in the manner of a pleading, and shall contain the following (which shall, insofar as practicable, be set forth in the order stated):

2021年10月28日 · This rule is intended to provide a simple and expeditious method for Supreme Court supervision of orders failing to extend or discharging indicting grand juries under Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 556.5.

2024年12月3日 · For the purposes of this rule, "hazardous evidence" means any physical evidence that a party seeks to bring into the courtroom that may create a substantial and serious risk of harm if ingested or absorbed, or if otherwise determined by the court to create a substantial and serious risk of harm.

This document outlines rules of criminal procedure for the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court in the Philippines. It addresses procedures for appeals, such as filing briefs, extensions, dismissal for failure to prosecute, and certifying cases to the Supreme Court.

This is a disputable presumption provided under Section 3 (m) 43 of Rule 131 of the Rules of Court. The presumption of regularity in the performance of duties can be overturned only if evidence is presented to prove that the public officers were not properly performing their duty or they were inspired by improper motive.