
2022 SCC 12 (CanLII) | R. v. Tim | CanLII
2022年4月14日 · The police investigated the appellant, Mr. Sokha Tim, for a traffic collision after he hit a roadside sign on a busy road in Calgary and kept driving until his car stopped. An …
2022年4月14日 · tim Sokha Tim Appelant c. Sa Majesté la Reine Intimée Répertorié : R. c. Tim 2022 CSC 12 No du greffe : 39525. 2021 : 7 octobre; 2022 : 14 avril. Présents : Le juge en …
R. v. Tim - Supreme Court of Canada
2022年4月14日 · On October 8, 2016, Sokha Tim hit a road sign on a busy street in Calgary, Alberta and kept driving. When police found him about one kilometre away, the officer asked …
39525 - Supreme Court of Canada
2022年5月4日 · Sokha Tim 2021-01-25 Notice of change of counsel, (Letter Form), Sokha Tim has changed the lawyer of record from Jared Craig and Andrew Phypers, of Craig Hooker …
On October 8, 2016, Sokha Tim hit a road sign on a busy street in Calgary, Alberta and kept driving. When police found him about one kilometre away, the officer asked to see his driver’s …
1 The Accused, Sokha Tim, has been charged with a total of 10 offences pertaining to two indictments. 2 Indictment Q3 comprises the following counts: Count 1 — one charge contrary …
Members of the public rightly expect that police officers should know the very laws they enforce. In this case, the police arrested Mr. Tim for (lawfully) possessing one pill of Gabapentin, which …
Supreme Court upholds Calgary man's convictions ... - CityNews …
2022年4月14日 · In a ruling Thursday, the high court says that although police made a mistake, excluding the evidence in Sokha Tim’s case would ultimately harm the reputation of the …
Sokha Tim v. Her Majesty the Queen (39525) - SCC Hearings
The appellant was charged with offences related to the possession of a handgun, possession of fentanyl, and breach of an undertaking. He had been involved in a single-vehicle collision, and …
Sokha Tim v. Her Majesty the Queen | Supreme Court Hearings
Sokha Tim v. Her Majesty the Queen Did the police officer's mistake of law render the appellant's arrest unlawful and therefore arbitrary under