This case has been argued at great length before us not only because a large number of lessees of lime stone quarries are involved and each of them has pains- takingly and exhaustively canvassed his factual as well as legal points of view but also because this is the first case of its kind in the country involving issues relating to environment ...

2018年9月16日 · In the Dehradun Valley Litigation case, the Central Government had become concerned about the destructive mining operations in the Valley at the same time when the Supreme Court took up the issue. In 1983, the Government of India appointed a Working Group to inspect the limestone quarries in the Dehradun-Mussoorie area.

2024年3月16日 · The case of Sakiri vasu v. State of UP and others (2007) is one of the remarkable judgments of the Supreme Court of India. It deals with and discusses the importance of Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the CrPC) and the powers of the Judicial Magistrate to ensure a proper investigation of the matter.

2024年7月3日 · Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra & Ors v State of UP & Ors Case Summary. In the landmark case of Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra & Ors v. State of U.P. & Ors, the Supreme Court of India addressed the extensive environmental damage caused by limestone quarrying in the Doon Valley.

The facts of the case, as found by the High Court, are no longer in dispute and the 648 question that is raised in this appeal is whether the appellant had exceeded the right of private defence of person. The relevant facts for our purposes are these.

2024年7月26日 · The Supreme Court of India, in Joginder Kumar vs State of UP, addressed several critical issues regarding the power of arrest and the protection of individual liberty. The Court recognised the substantial misuse of arrest powers by police officers and laid down guidelines to curb such arbitrary actions.

Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. & Ors., 2013, was delivered by a Five-Judge Constitution Bench of the Honorable Supreme Court on 12th November 2013. In the present appeal, the appellant Lalita Kumari has appealed against the Government of UP through a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution. Issue

2023年11月16日 · The case of Kharak Singh vs. State of UP centres on the constitutional scrutiny of the Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations, particularly Regulation 236 and its impact on fundamental rights. It specifically questions the potential infringement on the right to freedom of movement and personal liberty, as guaranteed by Articles 19(1)(d), 21 and 32 of ...

2018年6月9日 · FACTS: Petitioner Lockheed Detective and Watchman Agency, Inc. (Lockheed) entered into a contract for security services with respondent University of the Philippines (UP).

2024年5月8日 · As to what type and in which cases a preliminary inquiry is to be conducted, it will depend on the facts and circumstances of each case. While ensuring and protecting the rights of the accused and the complainant, a preliminary inquiry should be made time bound and, in any case, it should not exceed 7 days.