TCP Congestion Control using NS2

SOLVED: Imagine a TCP session over wireless where the congestion window is fixed at 5 segments (congestion control is turned off and no fast retransmits). Segments may get lost but are not reordered. The receiver has an infinite buffer and it sends an acknowledgment as soon as it receives a segment, i.e., acknowledgments are not deferred. Similarly, the sender transmits a segment as soon as it is allowed to. Each segment carries 1000 bytes and the time to transmit a segment is 2 ms. Assume that

Analysis and design of the google congestion control for web real-time communication (WebRTC) | DeepDyve

When to use and not use BBR | APNIC Blog

TCP vs. UDP — What's the Difference and Which Protocol is Faster?

Relaxing terminal congestion

Consider a simplified TCP's AIMD algorithm where the congestion window size is measured in number of segments, not in bytes. In additive increase, the congestion window size increases by one segment in each RTT. In multiplicative decrease, the congestion window size decreases by half (if the result is not an integer, round down to the nearest integer). Suppose that two TCP connections, C1 and C2, share a single congested link of speed 30 segments per second. Assume that both C1 and C2 are in the

TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) – The transmission protocol explained